This repository was archived by the owner on Feb 28, 2024. It is now read-only.
Reduce Arduino Lint compliance level to "specification" #61
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Linting the library in "strict" compliance mode fails due to the `name` value exceeding the recommended maximum of 16 characters. It is not possible to change the name, so this is not something that can be fixed. The expected error might mask real problems that cause other rule violations in the future. So the best thing is to reduce the compliance level to "specification" in which the library name length rule violation only results in a warning.
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Linting the library in "strict" compliance mode fails due to the
namevalue exceeding the recommended maximum of 16 characters.It is not possible to change the name, so this is not something that can be fixed. The expected error might mask real problems that cause other rule violations in the future. So the best thing is to reduce the compliance level to "specification" in which the library name length rule violation only results in a warning.